| Visit the Newsletter Archive |
![]()
|
|
|
March 20, 2008
![]()
Click Here For Additional Classes in Later April >>
![]() The next Educational Session organized by the Rookie Committee will be held on Wednesday, March 26 at 1 pm, again at the SCAOR office and presented FREE! We will spotlight two REALTORS® - Bill Ferreri, Broker for Realty Executives Bay-Coast, and Teresa Cason with Keller Williams Realty. The topic will be "I WAS A ROOKIE ONCE!" The Rookie Committee hopes to see new and experienced REALTORS® at the session. Space is limited! Please RSVP by going online. DO YOU WANT TO EARN YOUR BROKER'S LICENSE?
![]() If you are interested in attending a broker's pre-licensing course, please contact tracylee@scaor.com. A minimum of 25 members would need to attend this 99 hour course, so we need to know if there is any interest out there. There is no date set yet.
![]()
Click Here for Nomination Form >> ![]() Please join the Delaware Association of REALTORS® at a breakfast honoring the Honorable Thomas R. Carper on Monday, April 7 at 8:30 a.m. at the DAR office.
ETHICALLY SPEAKING...
![]()
Below is a case interpretation related to Article 7. Please read the complaint and make a judgment on how the Professional Standards Panel should rule. The Hearing Panel's decision will be published in next week's newsletter. Case #7-1: Acceptance of Compensation from Buyer and Seller Buyer A engaged REALTOR® B to locate a small commercial property. Buyer A explained his exact specifications indicating that he did not wish to compromise. They agreed that if REALTOR® B could locate such a property within Buyer A's price range, he - the buyer - would pay a finder's fee to REALTOR® B. Two weeks later, REALTOR® B called Buyer A to advise that Seller C had just listed a property with him that met all of Buyer A's specifications except that the listed price was a bit higher than Buyer A wanted to pay. Buyer A inspected the property and liked it, but said he would adhere to his original price range. REALTOR® B called Buyer A three days later to say that Seller C had agreed to sell at Buyer A's price. The sale was made and REALTOR® B collected a commission from Seller C and a finder's fee from Buyer A which was not disclosed to Seller C, REALTOR® B's client. Several weeks later, Seller C learned about the finder's fee that REALTOR® B had collected from Buyer A and filed a complaint with the Board of REALTOR® charging REALTOR® B with duplicity and unprofessional conduct. The complaint specified that when REALTOR® B had presented Buyer A's offer at less than the listed price, he, the seller, was reluctant to accept it, but REALTOR® B had convinced him that the offer was a fair one and not likely to be improved upon in the current market; and that REALTOR® B had dwelt at length on certain disadvantageous features of the property in an attempt to promote acceptance of the offer. The complaint charged that REALTOR® B had actually been the agent of the buyer while holding himself out as the agent of the seller. Further, Seller C asserted that REALTOR® B had never mentioned that he was representing the buyer or intended to be compensated by the buyer. At the hearing, REALTOR® B's defense was that he had served both buyer and seller faithfully; that he had not accepted Seller C's listing until after he had agreed to assist Buyer A in locating a property; and that in his judgment the listed price was excessive and the price actually paid was a fair price. How do you think the Professional Standards Panel ruled?
SAVE THE DATE
![]()
NEW LOCATION: Dover Downs - Dover, DE
For Additional Information please contact:
![]()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© Copyright 2008 Sussex County Association of REALTORS®
23407 Park Ave., Georgetown, DE 19947, USA Phone (302) 855-2300 ~ Fax (302) 855-2319 ~ info@scaor.com ~ www.scaor.com |
||